There question is how elementary particles and their basic interaction vertices could be realized in this framework.

- In TGD framework particle would correspond to pair of wormhole contact associated with closed magnetic flux tube carrying monopole flux. Strongly flattened rectangle with Minkowskian flux tubes as long edges with length given by weak scale and Euclidian wormhole contacts as short edges with CP
_{2}radius as lengths scale is a good visualization. 3-particle vertex corresponding to the replication of this kind of flux tube rectangle to two rectangles would replace 3-vertex of Feynman graph. There is analogy with DNA replication. Similar replication is expected to be possible also for the associated closed fermionic strings. - Denote the wormhole contacts by A and B and their opposite throats by A
_{i}and B_{i}, i=1,2. For fermions A_{1}can be assumed to carry the electroweak quantum numbers of fermion. For electroweak bosons A_{1}and A_{2}(for instance) could carry fermion and anti-fermion, whose quantum numbers sum up to those of ew gauge boson. These "corner fermions" can be called*active*.Also other distributions of quantum numbers must be considered. Fermion and anti-fermion could in principle reside at the same throat - say A

_{1}. One can however assume that second wormhole contact, say A has quantum numbers of fermion or weak boson (or gluon) and second contact carries quantum numbers screening weak isospin. - The model assumes that the weak isospin is neutralized in length scales longer than the size of the flux tube structure given by electro-weak scale. The screening fermions can be called
*passive*. If the weak isospin of W^{+/-}boson is neutralized in the scale of flux tube, 2 ν_{L}νbar_{R}pairs are needed (lepton number for these pairs must vanish) for W^{-}. For Z νbar_{L}ν_{R}and ν_{L}νbar_{R}are needed. The pairs of passive fermions could reside in the interior of flux tube, at string world sheet or at its corners just like active fermions. The first extreme is that the neutralizing neutrino-antineutrino pairs reside in interior at the opposite long edges of the rectangular*flux tube*. Second extreme is that they are at the corners of rectangular*closed string*. - Rectangular closed string containing active fermion at wormhole A (say) and with members of isospin neutralizing neutrino-antineutrino pair at the throats of B serves as basic units. In scales shorter than string length the end A would behave like fermion with weak isospin. At longer scales physical fermion would be hadron like entity with vanishing isospin and one could speak of confinement of weak isospin.
From these physical fermions one can build gauge bosons as bound states. Weak bosons and also gluons would be pairs of this kind of fermionic closed strings connecting wormhole contacts A and B. Gauge bosons (and also gravitons) could be seen as composites of string like physical fermions with vanishing net isospin rather than those of point like fundamental fermions.

- The decay of weak boson to fermion-antifermion pair would be flux tube replication in which closed strings representing physical fermion and anti-fermion continue along different copies of flux tube structure. The decay of boson to two bosons - say W→ WZ - by replication of flux tube would require creation of a pair of physical fermionic closed strings representing Z. This would correspond to a V-shaped vertex with the edge of V representing closed fermionic closed string turning backwards in time. In decays like Z→ W
^{+}W^{-}two closed fermion strings would be created in the replication of flux tube. Rectangular fermionic string would turns backwards in time in the replication vertex and the rectangular strings of Z would be shared between W^{+}and W^{-}.

This mesonlike picture about weak bosons as bound states of fermions sounds complex as compared with standard model picture. On the other hand only the spinor fields assignable to single fermion family are present.

A couple of comments concerning this picture are in order.

- M
^{8}duality provides a different perspective. In M^{8}picture these vertices could correspond to analogs of local 3 particle vertices for octonionic superfield, which become nonlocal in the map taking M^{8}=M^{4}× CP_{2}surfaces to surfaces in H=M^{4}× CP_{2}. The reason is that M^{4}point is mapped to M^{4}point but the tangent space at E^{4}point is mapped to a point of CP_{2}. If the point in M^{8}corresponds to a self-intersection point the tangent space at the point is not unique and point is mapped to two distinct points. There local vertex in M^{8}would correspond to non-local vertex in H and fermion lines could just begin. This would mean that at H-level fermion line at moment of replication and V-shaped fermion line pair beginning at different point of throat could correspond to 3-vertex at M^{8}level. - The 3-vertex representing replication could have interpretation in terms of quantum criticality: in reversed direction of time two branches of solution of classical field equations would co-incide.

See the article More about the construction of scattering amplitudes in TGD framework or the chapter The Recent View about Twistorialization in TGD Framework.

For a summary of earlier postings see Latest progress in TGD.

## Comments

## Post a comment